You rank, but traffic is falling
Your position has not moved and clicks have. AI Overviews are answering the question before anyone reaches you.
✨ AI Search Optimization
A growing share of buying decisions now start with a question to ChatGPT, Perplexity, or a Google AI Overview rather than a list of blue links. Those answers cite specific sources. This is the work that makes you one of them.
Your position has not moved and clicks have. AI Overviews are answering the question before anyone reaches you.
Ask an AI assistant to recommend a business like yours and someone else comes back.
This is where local search was fifteen years ago. The businesses that structure their content now are the ones that get cited later.
We ask the assistants what your customers ask, and show you exactly where you appear and where you do not.
Which questions you lose, who is being cited instead, and what those pages do that yours does not.
Content rewritten into answerable form, with the schema and entity signals that make it citable.
Monthly re-testing across the assistants, because these systems change constantly and this is not a one-off job.
No charge, no obligation.
Scope depends on how much content you have and how competitive your market is, so we audit before quoting. The audit is free and useful on its own: you will see exactly where you stand in AI search whether or not you work with us.
Get a free AI visibility auditIt overlaps but it is not the same. Classic SEO competes for a ranked position. AI search decides which sources to cite when composing an answer, which rewards clear structure, factual precision, consistent entity signals, and demonstrable expertise more than it rewards keyword placement.
No, and be sceptical of anyone who says it does. Traditional search still drives the majority of traffic for most local businesses. This runs alongside Local SEO, and the two reinforce each other, since the same clarity that helps a model cite you helps Google rank you.
No, and nobody honestly can. These systems are not ranked lists and their outputs vary between users and change without notice. What we can do is make you the most citable source available for the questions that matter, and measure whether citations increase.
We run a fixed set of real customer questions across the major assistants on a schedule and record whether you are cited, how you are described, and who is cited instead. That gives a baseline and a trend rather than a guess.
It depends which ones. There is a real difference between assistants that send you traffic and citations, and scrapers that only harvest training data. We set the policy so the ones that can send you customers are allowed and the rest are not.